<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>simon downes &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simondownes.co.uk/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simondownes.co.uk</link>
	<description>random verbiage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:40:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cuil Is Not So Cool</title>
		<link>http://simondownes.co.uk/2008/07/cuil-is-not-so-cool/</link>
		<comments>http://simondownes.co.uk/2008/07/cuil-is-not-so-cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simondownes.co.uk/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you that haven&#8217;t already heard, there a new player on the search scene. Cuil (pronounced &#8220;cool&#8221;) is taking on the Big 3 (Google, Yahoo and Microsoft) and claims a larger search index (120 billion web pages) than any of them. Comparisons with Google are inevitable, especially given the founders are ex-Googlers, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you that haven&#8217;t already heard, there a new player on the search scene. <a href="http://www.cuil.com">Cuil</a> (pronounced &#8220;cool&#8221;) is taking on the Big 3 (Google, Yahoo and Microsoft) and claims a larger search index (120 billion web pages) than any of them.</p>
<p>Comparisons with Google are inevitable, especially given the founders are ex-Googlers, and the general reaction so far is that Cuil fails to live up to expectations, primarily with regard to result relevance. Indeed, my first impressions were certainly not that great&#8230;</p>
<p>Having recently released a website for my Air Cadet squadron I thought I&#8217;d see how easy it is to find using Cuil. The query was &#8220;1343 squadron&#8221;; the results were, pretty useless, seeming to be a random collection of results for either the number 1343 or the word squadron. There was no apparent linking of the two. Appending &#8220;atc&#8221; to the query to narrow the search, results in absolutely nothing found, whereas the top four Google results for both queries are directly relevant to the search.</p>
<p>The biggest problem for Cuil at the moment is the risk of people trying it out, only to discover it doesn&#8217;t help them find what they&#8217;re looking for and simply returning to Google. The tech-savvy crowd will no doubt stick around to see how things progress, but I doubt the majority of web users will be so forgiving of search results that are lacking in relevance.</p>
<p>Further reading:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/27/google-beats-cuil-hands-down-in-size-and-relevance-but-that-isnt-the-whole-story/">Google Beats Cuil Hands Down In Size And Relevance, But That Isn’t The Whole Story</a></li>
<li><a href="http://whydoeseverythingsuck.com/2008/07/cuil-and-counting-crows.html">Cuil And Counting Crows</a></li>
<li><a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=261738">Ask YC: On Cuil</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.leytonjay.co.uk/internet-stuff/new-search-engine-cuil">New Search Engine! Cuil</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cuil.com/info/features/">Cuil Features</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://simondownes.co.uk/2008/07/cuil-is-not-so-cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Number 1 Error Made By Online Retailers</title>
		<link>http://simondownes.co.uk/2008/07/number-1-error-made-by-online-retailers/</link>
		<comments>http://simondownes.co.uk/2008/07/number-1-error-made-by-online-retailers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://simondownes.co.uk/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other week I was discussing the issues I have with my knees when running and it was suggested I buy a knee support. So being the web-literate and lazy person that I am, I did a quick Google search in order to find a purveyor of said items. Every site I went to required [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other week I was discussing the issues I have with my knees when running and it was suggested I buy a knee support. So being the web-literate and lazy person that I am, I did a quick Google search in order to find a purveyor of said items. Every site I went to required me to create an account before being able to make a purchase.</p>
<p>Which brings me on nicely to the Number 1 Error Made By Online Retailers&#8230;<br />
Why, oh why, oh why, do I need to sign up, create an account or join your community in order to purchase something from you?</p>
<p>All I want is a knee support, a bunch of flowers, a simple birthday gift; I&#8217;m not looking for a long term relationship at this point. If you do well this time and manage to deliver what I ordered, on time and for a reasonably price I may very well come back, but I don&#8217;t know you well enough yet. I don&#8217;t want to worry about how you store my password, address and credit card details, or whether you&#8217;re going to send me spam.</p>
<p>The number one thing that will make me leave your website and probably never come back is requiring me to open an account in order to complete a simple and potentially one-off purchase. I don&#8217;t have to do it when I shop in the high street, so why do you feel it&#8217;s ok on the Web?</p>
<p>A couple of years ago I used to spend a lot of time and money at <a href="http://www.overclockers.co.uk">Overclockers.co.uk</a>. Their prices weren&#8217;t the lowest but the website was simple and uncluttered, and more importantly I didn&#8217;t need to create an account. Just find what I want to buy, go to the checkout, fill in the absolute minimum details for completing a credit card transaction over the internet and that&#8217;s it. Then they redesigned their site and included the apparently obligatory &#8220;My Account&#8221; functionality. Unfortunately the redesigned site was almost identical to <a href="http://www.dabs.com">Dabs</a> and <a href="http://www.ebuyer.com">eBuyer</a> and had totally lost its simple and original look and feel. Seeing as I already had accounts with eBuyer and Dabs and didn&#8217;t want another one, I stopped shopping there.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a web developer creating online retail sites, think twice before requiring an account before allowing a user to make a purchase, you could be causing your client to lose sales&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://simondownes.co.uk/2008/07/number-1-error-made-by-online-retailers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

